<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for HawkEye</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hawkeye.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hawkeye.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Observing Life</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 21:13:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Blog This: » How Google Talk could integrate with Google Base &#124; IP Telephony, VoIP, Broadband &#124; ZDNet.com by madgravity</title>
		<link>http://hawkeye.wordpress.com/2005/10/29/blog-this-%c2%bb-how-google-talk-could-integrate-with-google-base-ip-telephony-voip-broadband-zdnetcom/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>madgravity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2005 10:19:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hawkeye.wordpress.com/2005/10/29/blog-this-%c2%bb-how-google-talk-could-integrate-with-google-base-ip-telephony-voip-broadband-zdnetcom/#comment-2</guid>
		<description>I used Google Talk for the first time yesterday ( had it when it first came out but couldn't find anyone to try it out with) and was suprised with the clear and clean sound coming from my headset and my friend felt the same. We have tried others but this is by far the best over 56 kbps, we don't have broadband out here in the high desert where we live. Ok, so it is basic, but it is good at what it does for a 900k download!  Makes ya wonder what the others put into  their bloted code!  Give it a little time, Rome wasn't built in a day. Google does it at their own pace, not yours or mine, and they get it right...   //bob</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used Google Talk for the first time yesterday ( had it when it first came out but couldn&#8217;t find anyone to try it out with) and was suprised with the clear and clean sound coming from my headset and my friend felt the same. We have tried others but this is by far the best over 56 kbps, we don&#8217;t have broadband out here in the high desert where we live. Ok, so it is basic, but it is good at what it does for a 900k download!  Makes ya wonder what the others put into  their bloted code!  Give it a little time, Rome wasn&#8217;t built in a day. Google does it at their own pace, not yours or mine, and they get it right&#8230;   //bob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Hello world! by Mr WordPress</title>
		<link>http://hawkeye.wordpress.com/2005/10/24/hello-world/#comment-1</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr WordPress</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2005 17:27:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1</guid>
		<description>Hi, this is a comment.&lt;br /&gt;To delete a comment, just log in, and view the posts' comments, there you will have the option to edit or delete them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, this is a comment.<br />To delete a comment, just log in, and view the posts&#8217; comments, there you will have the option to edit or delete them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
